Over the past two weeks, the UK has received two signals pointing in almost opposite directions. One came from the Treasury; the other, from the Middle East.
The Fiscal Picture Sent a Relatively Positive Signal First
On March 3, Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivered the Spring Forecast Statement, with an overall tone steadier than the market had originally expected. According to figures from the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), public borrowing this year is nearly £18 billion lower than projected in last autumn’s Budget, and the buffer against the fiscal stability rule has widened to about £24 billion. At the same time, the OBR expects inflation to fall back toward the 2% target in the second half of this year, earlier than previously forecast.
Taken on its own, this points to a fairly clear conclusion: the UK’s fiscal fundamentals have not deteriorated — if anything, they are more “back on track” than they were a few months ago. Borrowing pressure has eased, inflation expectations have improved, and policy space has expanded slightly — at least at the macro level, this is not a signal that calls for excessive pessimism.
But the Market Never Looks at the Fiscal Report Alone
The trouble is, the market never looks at just one report.
Just as the fiscal picture was turning more positive, tensions in the Middle East escalated rapidly on the other side. On February 28, the US and Israel jointly launched airstrikes against Iran, and European natural gas futures surged more than 50% in a single day on March 2, with the cumulative rise approaching 75% by the time of writing. The sudden spike in energy prices affected not the property market directly first, but the entire pricing logic of the interest-rate market.
Before the conflict, the market had reached a fairly high consensus that the Bank of England would cut rates at its March 19 meeting, with the probability of a cut once close to 90%. After the event, expectations reversed quickly, with the probability falling back to around 27%. The market now generally leans toward the view that there may be only one rate cut across all of 2026.
The real question the market now faces is no longer simply “will there be a cut,” but “how long will we have to wait for one” — or even whether a renewed risk of rate hikes needs to be considered. This shift may not show up immediately in prices, but it will certainly show up first in mortgage-cost expectations, buyer sentiment and the overall pace of transactions.
Energy Pressure Exists, but May Not Hit Households Immediately
Although the energy market has swung sharply, the impact on ordinary UK households’ energy spending may not translate into an equivalent pressure right away. Because the April Energy Price Cap was set some time ago, the average household electricity bill is actually expected to fall by about £117. So the direct impact of this round of energy shock on household consumers won’t become clearer until the next billing cycle in July at the earliest. The macro market has already begun repricing risk, but there remains a time lag before the pressure is felt at the household-consumption level.
The Housing Market Hasn’t Been Rattled Yet — Prices Are Still Holding
Within this time lag, the UK housing market’s own data has, for now, remained stable.
Halifax’s February data shows the average house price nationally was £301,151, up 0.3% month on month and 1.3% year on year. This is the strongest annual gain in four months, and it also means the average price has now held above £300,000 for a second consecutive month. Looking at these figures alone, it’s at least fair to say the recent geopolitical storm has not yet visibly disrupted the market’s underlying rhythm.
What’s Really Worth Watching Is the Regional Divergence
But the real story in the housing market has never just been the national average.
What’s genuinely worth watching remains the divergence between regions. Northern Ireland rose 6.3% year on year, Scotland rose 4.7%, and the North West of England, home to Manchester, rose 2.9%; by contrast, London fell 1.0%, and the South overall continues to be under pressure. In other words, the “North strong, South weak” storyline hasn’t changed — if anything, it has become even more pronounced under current conditions.
This divergence isn’t hard to understand. With interest rates still elevated and buyers more sensitive to their monthly payments, cities with lower prices and a more accessible entry threshold are naturally better positioned to capture genuine demand. Southern markets, London in particular, still hold long-term value, but face greater short-term pressure from a high price base, higher mortgage costs and stricter affordability ratios. By contrast, cities like Manchester, where price levels still have relative headroom, are more likely to show resilience in a high-rate era.
The Rising Share of First-Time Buyers Is an Important Signal
An interesting signal has also emerged on the demand side: in January 2026, first-time buyers accounted for 34.3% of all transactions across England — the highest share for that month since records began in 2006. This is not a number that can easily be dismissed. It doesn’t reflect a market entirely free of pressure — rather, it shows that under pressure, structural demand still exists, and buyers are choosing to enter the market they can actually afford.
In Manchester, for example, the average entry price for first-time buyers is about £230,000 — clearly below the national average. This accessibility is precisely why the city has been able to sustain demand under current conditions. While the broader market debates a delayed rate cut and mortgage rates that remain stubbornly high, buyers in some places are no longer waiting for the “perfect moment” — they’re simply making decisions based on what they can actually afford.
Manchester Isn’t Just Seeing Demand — It’s Also Attracting Long-Term Capital
Beyond price and transaction structure, there’s a more notable local development in Manchester worth a closer look.
On March 7, Manchester City Council’s executive committee approved a ten-year partnership framework with the Greater Manchester Pension Fund (GMPF), building roughly 1,600 low-carbon housing units on brownfield land through the council’s housing company, “This City.” Of all the units, at least 20% will be priced under the Manchester Living Rent scheme, with rent capped at Local Housing Allowance levels.
This isn’t just an ordinary piece of local house-building news. The projects are spread across seven sites in the north, east and city centre of Manchester. The first completed project is No.1 Ancoats Green in Ancoats, comprising 129 units; the largest, the Monsall project, is being delivered in four phases totaling 651 units. The whole development pipeline behind this supports Manchester City Council’s long-term goal of delivering 36,000 new homes by 2032, of which 10,000 will be affordable units.
What’s really worth noting here isn’t just the numbers themselves, but the nature of the capital involved. When a pension fund is willing to commit ten years of capital to a city’s housing infrastructure, that reflects not a short-term speculative bet, but a longer-term confidence: that this location’s housing demand over the next decade is still worth allocating to, building for, and locking in ahead of time.
(In some ways, a signal like this is even more informative than monthly house-price data — because monthly data can be swayed by sentiment, while long-term institutional capital sits closer to a structural judgment.)
The Direction Hasn’t Changed — the Timing Needs Recalibrating
Taken together, before the outbreak of the Iran conflict, the UK’s fiscal fundamentals had already been improving: borrowing was falling, inflation was on track to ease, and the fiscal buffer had widened. What the conflict has brought is a short-term shock to energy prices and uncertainty over the path of interest rates — not a reversal of the fundamentals. The housing-market data supports the same conclusion: prices rising modestly, first-time-buyer share hitting a record high, and institutional capital continuing to move in. Macro noise has never been in short supply — the shock of the 2022 mini-Budget was one example, and the sharp rate rises of 2023 another. Each time the market has absorbed a shock, structural demand has reasserted itself.
For the UK housing market, we can conclude: the direction has not changed, though the timetable may need to be recalibrated. Let’s wait and see.
Have a question about this guide? Leave a comment below, or ask Zagdim directly.
Your first stop for international property and global living.
Research and insights. Know what’s changing. Understand what matters.
